<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is Adobe thinking not supporting new computers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dangrossman.info/2008/10/26/what-is-adobe-thinking-not-supporting-new-computers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dangrossman.info/2008/10/26/what-is-adobe-thinking-not-supporting-new-computers/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneur and web developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://www.dangrossman.info/2008/10/26/what-is-adobe-thinking-not-supporting-new-computers/comment-page-1/#comment-71827</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangrossman.info/?p=288#comment-71827</guid>
		<description>In case you didn&#039;t see it in your browser, all comments after the first one show up half off the screen in Firefox. I&#039;m using version 2.0.0.14.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you didn&#8217;t see it in your browser, all comments after the first one show up half off the screen in Firefox. I&#8217;m using version 2.0.0.14.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://www.dangrossman.info/2008/10/26/what-is-adobe-thinking-not-supporting-new-computers/comment-page-1/#comment-63793</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangrossman.info/?p=288#comment-63793</guid>
		<description>Wow I hope this isn&#039;t be the case for any applications, imagine spending $600 on an Adobe App it&#039;s not yet compatible! LOL!

For a minute I thought it would only affect vista, but it&#039;s for XP too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow I hope this isn&#8217;t be the case for any applications, imagine spending $600 on an Adobe App it&#8217;s not yet compatible! LOL!</p>
<p>For a minute I thought it would only affect vista, but it&#8217;s for XP too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderik Emmerink</title>
		<link>http://www.dangrossman.info/2008/10/26/what-is-adobe-thinking-not-supporting-new-computers/comment-page-1/#comment-62946</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderik Emmerink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 05:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangrossman.info/?p=288#comment-62946</guid>
		<description>I fully agree here. I noticed it a while ago and noticed it was still not available yesterday after my Vista reinstall (had to since hdd failed :-( ). The same issue with the current JRE from Sun.

The same feeling as I had with Linux plugins and drivers for ages. These are just the things that turn you off. It disappoints me a lot, they should do these developments from the principal idea that it should not matter which platform you use and besides that I beleive that it will boost the product perception and will to adopt it even when you use another platform yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully agree here. I noticed it a while ago and noticed it was still not available yesterday after my Vista reinstall (had to since hdd failed <img src='http://www.dangrossman.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' />  ). The same issue with the current JRE from Sun.</p>
<p>The same feeling as I had with Linux plugins and drivers for ages. These are just the things that turn you off. It disappoints me a lot, they should do these developments from the principal idea that it should not matter which platform you use and besides that I beleive that it will boost the product perception and will to adopt it even when you use another platform yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendon Kozlowski</title>
		<link>http://www.dangrossman.info/2008/10/26/what-is-adobe-thinking-not-supporting-new-computers/comment-page-1/#comment-62612</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendon Kozlowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangrossman.info/?p=288#comment-62612</guid>
		<description>I think that it&#039;s much more surprising over how slow ALL 64-bit development has been.  It&#039;s seemingly not been made a priority, probably because all 64-bit OSs have been forced to provide a fallback for 32-bit based software, so what&#039;s the (business) point in taking extra time to support 64-bit when there are still many people with 32 bit computers and a long lifetime?

It kinda sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that it&#8217;s much more surprising over how slow ALL 64-bit development has been.  It&#8217;s seemingly not been made a priority, probably because all 64-bit OSs have been forced to provide a fallback for 32-bit based software, so what&#8217;s the (business) point in taking extra time to support 64-bit when there are still many people with 32 bit computers and a long lifetime?</p>
<p>It kinda sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.dangrossman.info/2008/10/26/what-is-adobe-thinking-not-supporting-new-computers/comment-page-1/#comment-62608</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangrossman.info/?p=288#comment-62608</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s more that just that. They do not support Vista Home Basic for some of their programs as well, so they are losing money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s more that just that. They do not support Vista Home Basic for some of their programs as well, so they are losing money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.dangrossman.info/2008/10/26/what-is-adobe-thinking-not-supporting-new-computers/comment-page-1/#comment-62607</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangrossman.info/?p=288#comment-62607</guid>
		<description>Interestingly, I came across this earlier today from the MS Silverlight website, a couple of hours after reading this post:

RECOMMENDED: Use Silverlight in the 32-bit Internet Explorer process on x64 systems. Most browser plug-ins (including Silverlight, Flash, Java and almost all ActiveX controls) only work in 32-bit browsers currently.

From this I gathered that a 32bit process IE/browser is required to run not only silverlight but also all the other plug-ins it mentions. I was trying to install on a 32 bit Vista just for reference.

I&#039;ve no doubt that the 64bit support will soon come, but agree that it&#039;s a little peculiar that it hasn&#039;t been more swift in coming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly, I came across this earlier today from the MS Silverlight website, a couple of hours after reading this post:</p>
<p>RECOMMENDED: Use Silverlight in the 32-bit Internet Explorer process on x64 systems. Most browser plug-ins (including Silverlight, Flash, Java and almost all ActiveX controls) only work in 32-bit browsers currently.</p>
<p>From this I gathered that a 32bit process IE/browser is required to run not only silverlight but also all the other plug-ins it mentions. I was trying to install on a 32 bit Vista just for reference.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve no doubt that the 64bit support will soon come, but agree that it&#8217;s a little peculiar that it hasn&#8217;t been more swift in coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

