<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Whole New Web Starts Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dangrossman.info/2007/05/02/a-whole-new-web-starts-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dangrossman.info/2007/05/02/a-whole-new-web-starts-now/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneur and web developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Ohrn</title>
		<link>http://www.dangrossman.info/2007/05/02/a-whole-new-web-starts-now/comment-page-1/#comment-23708</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Ohrn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 10:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangrossman.info/2007/05/02/a-whole-new-web-starts-now/#comment-23708</guid>
		<description>I agree that this new Microsoft initiative is a huge leap forward in RIA on the web.  I think the biggest advantage is that you can take advantage of almost the entire .NET CLR when using Silverlight.  That gives an extensibility that Adobe&#039;s Flash can only dream of.

I hope, however, that both platforms succeed in the places that they deserve to.  Microsoft&#039;s solution will be integrated into current .NET development stacks, and Flash will continue to be prevalent across the web.  Maybe we&#039;ll end up with Flash being used for animation and Silverlight for video playback (like they&#039;re intended for) but I guess only time will tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that this new Microsoft initiative is a huge leap forward in RIA on the web.  I think the biggest advantage is that you can take advantage of almost the entire .NET CLR when using Silverlight.  That gives an extensibility that Adobe&#8217;s Flash can only dream of.</p>
<p>I hope, however, that both platforms succeed in the places that they deserve to.  Microsoft&#8217;s solution will be integrated into current .NET development stacks, and Flash will continue to be prevalent across the web.  Maybe we&#8217;ll end up with Flash being used for animation and Silverlight for video playback (like they&#8217;re intended for) but I guess only time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.dangrossman.info/2007/05/02/a-whole-new-web-starts-now/comment-page-1/#comment-21839</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 08:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangrossman.info/2007/05/02/a-whole-new-web-starts-now/#comment-21839</guid>
		<description>Silverlight is a good compliment to an existing Microsoft-supplied development stack.  It&#039;s not the second coming of Christ.  It&#039;s not &quot;a new web&quot;.  It&#039;s still a third-party plugin that requires a download that doesn&#039;t work on all browsers.  It&#039;s a better Flash with ActionScript replaced by new libraries for your [limited] language of choice.  Dan, I expected you to look at this differently than the rest of the hype-mongers.

Oh well, lets jump on the bandwagon before it fills up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silverlight is a good compliment to an existing Microsoft-supplied development stack.  It&#8217;s not the second coming of Christ.  It&#8217;s not &#8220;a new web&#8221;.  It&#8217;s still a third-party plugin that requires a download that doesn&#8217;t work on all browsers.  It&#8217;s a better Flash with ActionScript replaced by new libraries for your [limited] language of choice.  Dan, I expected you to look at this differently than the rest of the hype-mongers.</p>
<p>Oh well, lets jump on the bandwagon before it fills up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.dangrossman.info/2007/05/02/a-whole-new-web-starts-now/comment-page-1/#comment-21391</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 03:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangrossman.info/2007/05/02/a-whole-new-web-starts-now/#comment-21391</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, I meant Flex, not Apollo. And the Mac plugin is indeed larger than 4MB, as it&#039;s a universal binary, although this is all still a beta. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, I meant Flex, not Apollo. And the Mac plugin is indeed larger than 4MB, as it&#8217;s a universal binary, although this is all still a beta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Dowdell</title>
		<link>http://www.dangrossman.info/2007/05/02/a-whole-new-web-starts-now/comment-page-1/#comment-21388</link>
		<dc:creator>John Dowdell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 02:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dangrossman.info/2007/05/02/a-whole-new-web-starts-now/#comment-21388</guid>
		<description>Hi, just checking... you&#039;re aware that YouTube uses casually-produced video, often compressed, which is then recompressed on the server to the final video format before being displayed by Adobe Flash Player, right? 

I&#039;m not sure of Microsoft&#039;s eventual download sizes, performance, or capabilites. (The current Mac 1.1 alpha is 10.3 megabytes, for instance.) Some creators do choose to use &quot;Loading&quot; screens, but I prefer it when SWFs just start up in the usual way, &quot;in a flash&quot;. Adobe&#039;s Apollo project is not an in-browser plugin, but instead brings normal web apps to the desktop, as standalone applications which can read/write the local drive... different thing entirely.

I think the title may actually be &quot;A Whole New Web Starts Five Years Ago&quot;, but I won&#039;t insist on that one.... ;-)

cu, jd/adobe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, just checking&#8230; you&#8217;re aware that YouTube uses casually-produced video, often compressed, which is then recompressed on the server to the final video format before being displayed by Adobe Flash Player, right? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure of Microsoft&#8217;s eventual download sizes, performance, or capabilites. (The current Mac 1.1 alpha is 10.3 megabytes, for instance.) Some creators do choose to use &#8220;Loading&#8221; screens, but I prefer it when SWFs just start up in the usual way, &#8220;in a flash&#8221;. Adobe&#8217;s Apollo project is not an in-browser plugin, but instead brings normal web apps to the desktop, as standalone applications which can read/write the local drive&#8230; different thing entirely.</p>
<p>I think the title may actually be &#8220;A Whole New Web Starts Five Years Ago&#8221;, but I won&#8217;t insist on that one&#8230;. <img src='http://www.dangrossman.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>cu, jd/adobe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

